OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE – BBMP – 2016-17 -TILL DATE


The BBMP has issued only 13 Occupancy Certificates in 2016-17, of which 3 are commercial projects and 10 are residential apartments.

There are few hundred projects which had been completed and few hundred housing apartment projects are underway, but only few builders and the apartments have the MANDATORY OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE.

Between 2011-12 to 20161-7, the BBMP has issued around 300+ Occupancy Certificates and the remaining buildings or projects or apartments DOES NOT HAVE MANDATORY OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE, it means, that buildings or apartments or projects are NOT WORTH BUYING OR OCCUPYING.

The recent floods and the havoc caused by the rains is MAN MADE.  In one of the flood affected areas, the road width is 30 feet and there were several apartment complexes having more than 20+ apartments and the entire narrow road, in bangalore south, J.P.Nagar, has about 400 to 500 apartments, NONE OF THE BUILDINGS HAVE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE AND HAS NOT BEEN CONSTRUCTED AS PER THE SANCTIONED BUILDING PLAN AND THEY ARE ILLEGAL, IRREGUALR AND UNAUTHORISED.

APARTMENTS – APARTMENT COMPLEXES – ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT OR STRUCTURES OR MODIFICATION OR ALTERATION DONE AFTER OBTAINING OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE !!!!


IT HAS COME TO LIGHT THAT SOME OF THE APARTMENTS/APARTMENT COMPLEX/VILLAS/PROJECTS HAVE ILLEGALLY, WITHOUT PROPER SANCTION OR APPROVAL HAVE MADE OR CONSTRUCTED ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR BUILDINGS, MODIFIED THE EXISTING STRUCTURES, ALTERED THEM BEYOND RECOGNITION, SHIFTED SOME OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY OR REMOVED SOME OF THE STRUCTURES,  AFTER OBTAINING THE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE FROM THE APPROPRIATE PLANNING OR MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY.

SUCH CHANGES/MODIFICATIONS/ADDITIONS/ALTERNATIONS/RENOVATION/SHIFTING WILL RESULT IN THE AUTOMATIC CANCELLATION OF THE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE, WITHOUT ISSUING A NOTICE.

ILLEGAL OR UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION – APARTMENTS – B KATHA – READ THIS NEWSPAPER ARTICLE AND THE SUPREME COURT DIKAT – DEMOLITION MAN WILL BE AT THE DOORS OF UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION – EVEN IF HE IS A CABINET MINISTER !! BUYING AN APARTMENT WITH VIOLATIONS – ENJOY DEMOLITION


IF A MINISTER BUILDS OR CONSTRUCTS A BUILDING VIOLATING THE SANCTIONED BUILDING PLAN, HE HAS TO FACE THE MUSIC AND THE DEMOLITION MAN KNOCKING AT HIS DOORS !!!!

VIOLATION IS A VIOLATION, WHETHER IT IS COMMITTED BY THE MINISTER OR ORDINARY CITIZEN AND THE RULE IS THE SAME FOR EVERYONE!!!

BUYING AN APARTMENT OR SITE WITHOUT PROPER SANCTION, APPROVAL AND CLEARANCE, ANY DAY, THE BUYER HAS TO FEEL THE HEAT AND PAY FOR THE MISTAKES!!!

DARE TO BUY ONE!!! ENJOY THE MUSIC OF DEMOLITION !!!!!!

An adverse ruling by SC in the contempt of court petition filed by activist Nagalakshmi could make the railway minister’s position in the NarendraModi Cabinet untenable

Union railway minister D V Sadananda Gowda’s construction of a five-storey complex at a residential plot in HSR Layout, 3rd Phase has returned to haunt him. Activist Nagalakshmi Bai, 51, who had dragged Sadananda Gowda and his former cabinet colleague and present Sringeri MLA, D N Jeevaraj, to the Karnataka High Court, filed a contempt petition against them in the Supreme Court on Aug 5, 2014. The court has posted the matter for November 11.

“The Railway Minister and his former colleague Jeevaraj have wilfully disobeyed the Supreme Court order which had restrained any further construction at the site and structure in question. But they have gone ahead with construction and other activities at the site. As it is a major violation, I have brought the same to the notice of the Supreme Court through the contempt notice,” Nagalakshmi Bai told Bangalore Mirror.

Nagalakshmi has filed the contempt petition stating that the two had violated the Supreme Court order by going ahead with construction activity when they had been restrained from doing so. She also attached 14 photographs, which she claimed were taken on June 15, 2014, stating they attested to activities carried out when a restraining order was on.

The case dates back to 2011, when Nagalakshmi filed a public interest litigation (PIL) against Sadananda Gowda and Jeevaraj over violations pertaining to a construction on site numbers 12 and 13 at HSR Layout, 3rd Phase. Nagalakshmi had contended that the two, who were allotted sites measuring 50′ X 80′ each under G category (CM’s discretionary quota) had violated Bangalore Development Authority’s (BDA) lease-cum-sale agreement that restricts lessees/purchasers from subdividing a property and constructing more than one dwelling house on it during the initial 10 years. She had also contended that the duo had amalgamated the two sites even after BDA had rejected an application in this regard.

High Court, which heard the PIL on October 19, 2012, ruled against the duo and asked the BDA to act within three months as per the lease-cum-sale agreement, which empowers the agency to forfeit the land without paying any compensation in case of violation of conditions.

Subsequently, the duo moved the Supreme Court challenging High Court judgment. The Supreme Court passed an order on January 2, 2013, restraining the petitioners from carrying out further construction. “…The petitioners are also restrained from carrying on further construction on the subject plots without the leave of this court,” the apex court had observed.

Speaking to Bangalore Mirror, Gowda said, “I haven’t received any notice pertaining to the contempt petition so far. But I haven’t carried out any sort of work at the site and the allegations reportedly made by the applicant are baseless. Whatever work was carried out at the structure was done before the Supreme Court stay. Nothing was done after that.”
D N Jeevaraj told BM: “I haven’t carried out any activity there and haven’t even gone to the place either except once when I needed a photograph for submission to the Supreme Court. Somebody may have given false information to her (Nagalakshmi Bai).”
Nagalakshmi, however, remained unfazed: “As they have repeatedly violated the rules and even the Supreme Court directive, we will seek action when the matter comes up in November.

AKRAMA IN TROUBLE ? OR DELAYED?


THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NOTORIOUS AKRAMA SCHEME OF REGULARISING THE ILLEGAL/UNAUTHORISED/DEVIATIONS/VIOLATIONS, (BUILDINGS/LAYOUTS) MIGHT BE DELAYED DUE TO THE ONSET OF ELECTIONS AND THE CLAMPDOWN OF `CODE OF CONDUCT`.

THE LAW ABIDING AND HONEST TAX PAYING CITIZENS IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD ARE THE WORST AFFECTED BY THE ILLEGALITIES AND IRREGULARITIES OF THIS ILLEGAL AKRAMA SCHEME, THEIR  HARD EARNED MONEY (PAID AS TAX)IS UTILISED FOR PROVIDING BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE TO THESE ILLEGAL/IRREGUALR/UNAUTHORISED LAYOUTS AND BUILDINGS OF THEIR NEIGHBOURS.

DEVIATORS AND VIOLATORS ENJOY BENIFT AT  AT OTHERS COST. `OC`

`OC` HERE MEANS AT OTHERS COST AND NOT OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE.

THE LESSON:

IF YOU FOLLOW THE RULE OF THE LAND, YOU WILL BE PUNISHED AND AT YOUR COST AND EXPENSE,  OTHERS ENJOY AND MAKE MERRY.

TUGLAQ DURBAR – BBMP – ILLOGICAL BETTERMENT CHARGES – LAW ABIDING AND HONEST TAX PAYING CITIZENS ARE CHEATED


THIS IS THE FIFTH/SIXTH REVISION OF BETTERMENT CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED FROM VIOLATORS AND DEVIATORS AT THE COST OF HONEST TAX PAYING CITIZENS.

THE HONEST TAX PAYING AND LAW ABIDING CITIZENS MONEY IS SPENT (LOOTED) TO PROVIDE FACILITIES FOR THE ILLEGALITIES OF THE OFFENDERS, VIOLATORS AND DEVIATORS OF LAW!!!

STRANGE!

IT CAN ONLY HAPPEN IN INDIA!!!

THE ACTUAL COST OF PROVIDING INFRASTRUCTURE AND CIVIC AMENITIES TO THESE ILLEGAL, UNAUTHORISED,VIOLATED AND DEVIATED PROPERTIES WILL NOT BE LESS THAN RS1,000/- TO RS2,000/- PER SQUARE METER OR RS100/- TO RS200/- PER SQUARE FEET (approximately)  , BUT THE LAND OWNERS(property owners), WHOSE PROPERTY VALUES ARE IN TERMS OF CRORES, ARE POOR(Crorepaties) AND HENCE, THE CHARGES ARE FIXED AT RS200/-  AND RS250/- PER SQUARE METER OR RS20/- TO RS25/- PER SQUARE FEET.

LARGE SCALE ENCROACHMENT, DEVIATION, VIOLATION, IRREGUALRITIES AND ILLEGALITIES BY LAND SHARKS, LAND MAFIA IN BANGALORE


LARGE SCALE ENCROACHMENT, DEVIATION, VIOLATION, IRREGUALRITIES AND ILLEGALITIES BY LAND SHARKS, LAND MAFIA AND BUILDERS ROCK THE BBMP COUNCIL MEET IN THE NEW YEAR – 2014.

http://www.kannadaprabha.com/districts/bangalore/%E0%B2%85%E0%B2%95%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%B0%E0%B2%AE-%E0%B2%95%E0%B2%9F%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%9F%E0%B2%A1;-%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%AC%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%8E%E0%B2%82%E0%B2%AA%E0%B2%BF-%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%A6%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%AF%E0%B2%B0%E0%B3%81-%E0%B2%95%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%A1%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%95%E0%B2%BF%E0%B2%A1%E0%B2%BF/157110.html

HOUSE BUILDING CO – OP SOCIETY`S PROJECT IN SHAMBLES


THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA`S ORDERS AND THE SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS BY THE BDA AND THE STATE GOVERNMENT HAS FINALLY BROUGHT THE JUSTICE TO THE LANDLORDS, WHOSE LANDS HAD BEEN ACQUIRED FOR THE SOCIETY. 

THE LAYOUT(SUPPOSES TO HAVE FORMED) AND THE ALLOTMENT STANDS CANCELLED IN RESPECT OF SEVERAL SURVEY NUMBERS.

AS SUSPECTED AND PUBLISHED BY ONE OF OUR READERS REGARDING THE ILLEGALITIES and IRREGULARITIES OF THE HOUSING SOCIETY, WHICH IS UNDER SCRUTINY BY THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, IG STAMPS AND REGISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE POSSESSION OF THE SITES MIGHT TAKE FEW MORE YEARS FROM NOW, AS IT IS ALREADY DELAYED BY OVER 5 YEARS.

ANOTHER WELFARE HOUSING SOCIETY`S ACTIVITIES ARE ALSO UNDER SCRUTINY BY THE LOKAYUKTA, MAY GET INTO LEGAL TANGLE, DUE TO IRREGULARITIES.