BOUGHT A PROPERTY WITH DEFECTIVE TITLES OR DISCREPANCY OR VIOLATION OR DEVIATION OR FAKE DOCUMENTS ? DO NOT WORRY


Many properties with title defects and discrepancy, building plan violation, zonal violation, fake or manipulated licenses or approvals had been sold to innocent buyers.

Buyers, who had been cheated, can substantiate their case in the court of law and seek relief from the court and initiate appropriate proceedings against the offenders.  But, in our system, this process takes its own sweet time, due to such delays, the buyers are unwillingly compelled not to take or initiate any action against the cheats and frauds.  But, the buyers must take appropriate action at the right time, if not, legal relief might not be available.

Legal remedy is available to the affected and the buyers need to take swift and stern action against the seller.

Advertisements

DEMOLITION MAN IN ACTION AT SARAKKI LAKE, PUTTENAHALLY, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g78RTHVhkEw


THE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION HAS INITIATED THE DEMOLITION PROCESS AND IS IN THE PROCESS OF RECOVERING OVER RS2000 CRORE WORTH GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES IN AND AROUND SARAKKI LAKE, BANGALORE.

IT MUST BE NOTED THAT ANOTHER LEADING TOP CREDAI BUILDER IS IN THE NET.  THE SURVEY AND EXAMINATION IS UNDER PROGRESS.  THE BUILDERS ENCROACHMENT AND THE ENCROACHED PORTION WILL BE DEMOLISHED.  EARLIER, THIS BUILDER, ENDANGERED THE SECURITY OF THE NATION BY BUILDING AN HIGH RISE APARTMENT, IN THE VICINITY OF A HIGH SECURITY LAB AT BANGALORE.  IT HAS BECOME AN HABIT OF THIS BUILDER TO ENDANGER THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE AND ALSO THE SECURITY OF THE NATION.  THIS BUILDER`S UNDER CONSTRUCTION APARTMENTS WAS UNDER LITIGATION AT ANEAKL COURT AND EVEN AT THAT STAGE WITH THE HELP OF THE MARKETING TEAM, SOLD THE APARTMENTS. ANOTHER APARTMENT COMPLEX DID NOT HAVE KATHA AND WAS LYING TO ALL THE OCCUPANTS AS WELL AS TO THE BUYERS THAT THEY WOULD GET THE KATHA AND PRODUCED A FAKE DOCUMENT CALLED `SWADEENA PATHRA` FROM VILLAGE PANCHAYAT, BUT THE KAGGALIPURA GRAMA PANCHAYAT DID NOT HAVE THE FILE AT ALL.  FINALLY MANAGED TO GET SOME KATHA FOR THE ENTIRE OR FULL EXTENT OF THE PROPERTY.

BEWARE!!!

CHECK AND BUY!!!

HURRY WILL MAKE YOU WORRY!!!!

CREDAI OR TOP BUILDER DOES NOT MEAN EVERYTHING IS ALL RIGHT !!!!!!

watch tv9 kannada –

ENCROACHMENT OF RAJA KALUVE AT HARALUR CLEARED BY THE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION


THE BANGALORE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION HAS FINALLY CLEARED THE ENCROACHMENT OF RAJA KALUVE IN HARALUR, KASAVANAHALLY AND KAIKONDARAHALLY, BANGALORE EAST TALUK OCCUPIED ILLEGALLY BY VESTED INTERESTS (THREE TOP CREDAI BUILDERS), NEAR SHUB ENCLAVE, WORTH FEW CRORES.

THE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION MUST ALSO INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE THREE XXXXXXX AFTER A THOROUGH ENQUIRY.

A PRESS REPORT ON THE RECENT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS BY BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA)


BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY`S NEW ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE BUILDERS, BY THE BUILDERS AND FOR THE WELFARE OF THE BUILDERS.

BDA IS DOING A YEOMAN`S SERVICE TO THE BUILDERS WITH THIS KIND OF GREAT SERVICE

A NEWS REPORT IN BANGALORE MIRROR

An official meeting between Urban Development Department (UDD) officials and Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Association of India (CREDAI), Bengaluru, representatives found in the file pertaining to the recent amendments to the BDA masterplan zoning regulations shows how the ‘plan’ unfolded. What followed were “builder/developer-friendly” amendments that clear a path for rampant commercialisation in residential areas across the city.

Some representatives of civic groups, headed by the Civic Action Forum (CAF), who legally fought the “mixed residential” usage in Masterplan 2015 that encouraged commercialisation in residential areas, recently inspected the file pertaining to the issue in the UDD. And halfway through the documents, what they found was baffling: a note that mentioned a meeting of officials with CREDAI, which is basically an association that looks out for builders’ and developers’ interests.
Following the High Court order banning commercial activities in residential areas with roads less than 40 ft width, the government last month notified certain amendments to the Masterplan zoning regulations, which is in total contravention of what the BDA swore before the court.The Masterplan is a document that demarcates spaces for development of residential ,commercial, industrial zones along with parks, open spaces, drains etc.
Not only did the UDD do a U-turn on the BDA’s proposal, which spoke about disallowing commercial activities in residential areas with roads (carriageway) less than 40 feet, it also tweaked the feet to metres, citing 12 metres (which is 39 feet). Thus opening up ways and means for large-scale commercialization that would see residential localities even house IT firms.
Bangalore Mirror broke the story on January 8 highlighting the amendments which could be disastrous for the city which is already reeling under haphazard commercialisation of residential localities. Reacting to the news report, the administration at the highest level are now rethinking on the notification and are planning to withdraw it. Caught off guard with the gazette notification, BDA commissioner T Sham Bhat reportedly told the chief minister that the government had changed the proposals, overlooking his note.
It was clear from the very beginning that the amendments were done to favour the developers and the decision to tweak the proposals was taken at the highest level in the UDD.
“This note proves it. What was the CREDAI meeting note all about? It is beyond doubt that the decision to allow commercialization was taken at the behest of the builder lobby,” a highly placed source told Bangalore Mirror.
According to some of the representatives who accessed the documents, the first half of the file seemed to be on track with correspondence about the issue – from the start up to the High Court’s observations and directions and BDA commissioner’s affidavit not to allow commercial activity in residential main and residential mixed zones in the three rings (core area, suburbs and outer areas) if the road width is less than 40 feet. Along with this the file contained the proposal forwarded by the BDA for amendment.
“Halfway into the file, a note about a meeting of UDD with CREDAI, Bengaluru, baffled us. Why did the members from the realty sector meet officials on this issue? From then on, the note took a different direction and the final one was the amendment that came out in favour of the developers,” the members added.
Another revelation was the seven objections filed for the draft copy of the notification; all of them were from builders. Strangely, the draft copy was missing in the file and was not even available with the UD secretariat. As per rules, the government has to first publish the draft notification calling for suggestions/objections from citizens, giving a minimum of 15 days. Subsequently, the final notification would be issued.
“How did the builders file their objections to the draft when nobody even knew about it? We asked the officials to show us in which newspaper the draft was published and there was no answer from them. It’s ironic that the entire case was fought by citizens, but the draft notification is accessed only by builders,” said the members.
The officials are in a fix now as the issue is out in the open, and has snowballed into a controversy that has the government re-thinking the amendments.

INSIDE GOVT FILE

HC directive to ban commercial activities in residential areas
BDA commissioner’s assurance to HC
BDA’s proposal for zoning in tandem with assurance to HC 

A note on a meeting with representatives from realty sector…

Seven suggestions from builders make it to the final notification, bringing back commercial activities in residential areas and talking in terms of mtrs instead of feet

ENCROACHMENT OF GOVERNMENT LANDS AND LAKES BY VAKIL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FORMED IN RAJAPURA VILLAGE RECOVERED


vakil rajapura-encroachment-20150110_141818623 (2)

A PRESS REPORT –

M/s Vakil Housing Development Corporation Private Limited, No. 78, Koramangala, Industrial Area, Jyothi Nivas College Road, Bangalore-560 095, formed a layout named VAKIL ENCASA, At Rajapura Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District and sold SITES AND VILLAS in survey No.143/1, 143/2, 144, 144/1, 145, 146/1, 146/2, 147, 153/1, 153/2 &154/1 and a part of this layout belongs to the Government, where villas and parks were developed illegally, was illegally encroached by the builders, was demolished and recovered by the District Administration.

A part of this village belonged to Rajapura Mutt – A Veerashaiva Mutt, a part of the land still belongs to the very old temple of  and a large stretch of lands belonging to the temple and mutt is alleged to have been encroached by land mafia by creating XXXX documents and sold.

MORE TO COME !!!!!! 

DO NOT BUY THE PROPERTIES WITHOUT DUE DILIGENT EXAMINATION, EVEN FROM THE TOP DEVELOPERS, AS MANY OF THE PROJECTS ARE STILL UNDER LITIGATION

ILLEGAL OR UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION – APARTMENTS – B KATHA – READ THIS NEWSPAPER ARTICLE AND THE SUPREME COURT DIKAT – DEMOLITION MAN WILL BE AT THE DOORS OF UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION – EVEN IF HE IS A CABINET MINISTER !! BUYING AN APARTMENT WITH VIOLATIONS – ENJOY DEMOLITION


IF A MINISTER BUILDS OR CONSTRUCTS A BUILDING VIOLATING THE SANCTIONED BUILDING PLAN, HE HAS TO FACE THE MUSIC AND THE DEMOLITION MAN KNOCKING AT HIS DOORS !!!!

VIOLATION IS A VIOLATION, WHETHER IT IS COMMITTED BY THE MINISTER OR ORDINARY CITIZEN AND THE RULE IS THE SAME FOR EVERYONE!!!

BUYING AN APARTMENT OR SITE WITHOUT PROPER SANCTION, APPROVAL AND CLEARANCE, ANY DAY, THE BUYER HAS TO FEEL THE HEAT AND PAY FOR THE MISTAKES!!!

DARE TO BUY ONE!!! ENJOY THE MUSIC OF DEMOLITION !!!!!!

An adverse ruling by SC in the contempt of court petition filed by activist Nagalakshmi could make the railway minister’s position in the NarendraModi Cabinet untenable

Union railway minister D V Sadananda Gowda’s construction of a five-storey complex at a residential plot in HSR Layout, 3rd Phase has returned to haunt him. Activist Nagalakshmi Bai, 51, who had dragged Sadananda Gowda and his former cabinet colleague and present Sringeri MLA, D N Jeevaraj, to the Karnataka High Court, filed a contempt petition against them in the Supreme Court on Aug 5, 2014. The court has posted the matter for November 11.

“The Railway Minister and his former colleague Jeevaraj have wilfully disobeyed the Supreme Court order which had restrained any further construction at the site and structure in question. But they have gone ahead with construction and other activities at the site. As it is a major violation, I have brought the same to the notice of the Supreme Court through the contempt notice,” Nagalakshmi Bai told Bangalore Mirror.

Nagalakshmi has filed the contempt petition stating that the two had violated the Supreme Court order by going ahead with construction activity when they had been restrained from doing so. She also attached 14 photographs, which she claimed were taken on June 15, 2014, stating they attested to activities carried out when a restraining order was on.

The case dates back to 2011, when Nagalakshmi filed a public interest litigation (PIL) against Sadananda Gowda and Jeevaraj over violations pertaining to a construction on site numbers 12 and 13 at HSR Layout, 3rd Phase. Nagalakshmi had contended that the two, who were allotted sites measuring 50′ X 80′ each under G category (CM’s discretionary quota) had violated Bangalore Development Authority’s (BDA) lease-cum-sale agreement that restricts lessees/purchasers from subdividing a property and constructing more than one dwelling house on it during the initial 10 years. She had also contended that the duo had amalgamated the two sites even after BDA had rejected an application in this regard.

High Court, which heard the PIL on October 19, 2012, ruled against the duo and asked the BDA to act within three months as per the lease-cum-sale agreement, which empowers the agency to forfeit the land without paying any compensation in case of violation of conditions.

Subsequently, the duo moved the Supreme Court challenging High Court judgment. The Supreme Court passed an order on January 2, 2013, restraining the petitioners from carrying out further construction. “…The petitioners are also restrained from carrying on further construction on the subject plots without the leave of this court,” the apex court had observed.

Speaking to Bangalore Mirror, Gowda said, “I haven’t received any notice pertaining to the contempt petition so far. But I haven’t carried out any sort of work at the site and the allegations reportedly made by the applicant are baseless. Whatever work was carried out at the structure was done before the Supreme Court stay. Nothing was done after that.”
D N Jeevaraj told BM: “I haven’t carried out any activity there and haven’t even gone to the place either except once when I needed a photograph for submission to the Supreme Court. Somebody may have given false information to her (Nagalakshmi Bai).”
Nagalakshmi, however, remained unfazed: “As they have repeatedly violated the rules and even the Supreme Court directive, we will seek action when the matter comes up in November.

BEST WISHES ON THE OCCASION OF DASARA!


WE WISH ALL OUR READERS AND PATRONS A VERY HAPPY DASRA AND NAVARATHRI!

ON THIS OCCASION, WE WISH TO INTIMATE OUR READERS THAT FEW PROPERTIES WHICH ARE DEVELOPED AND SOLD BY LEADING DEVELOPERS HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES.

FREE HINTS OR HITS

DO NOT CALL OR SEND MAILS FOR DETAILS

CHECK FOR YOURSELF

THEY ARE ALL IN ALL WEBSITES AND NEWSPAPERS

ONE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH ONE FULL PAGE AD IN ALL LEADING NEWSPAPERS-ON KANAKAPURA ROAD- HAS SERIOUS LAND REFORM ISSUE!!

THE OTHER ONE, OLD, WHICH IS ALREADY SOLD HAS BEEN REMANDED BY THE HIGH COURT TO THE TRIAL COURT IN BANGALORE SOUTH(BETWEEN HOSUR ROAD AND SARJAPUR ROAD)- ALMOST ALL FLATS AND APARTMENTS SOLD BY THIS BUILDER!!!

GOVINDAA —————–GOVINDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA