The Government Pleaded before the High Court to permit the regularisation scheme Only ONCE. But, the highmarish questions posed by the divisional bench to the Government Advocate was logical and was unable to respond to it.
1). If this scheme is permitted, it is like legalising the illegality?
2). Why do`not you make necessary amendments by permitting more than 5% deviation?
3). Who permitted these illegal constructions and how did they come up?
There were too many unanswered questions and there was only one request:
Please allow this scheme ONLY ONCE. But, the court did not relent and posted the hearing to 18-01-2016.
The Akrama Sakrama scheme has not reached its finality in the High Court and the Government has not been able to properly find solutions for the issues raised.
Many readers have sent queries regarding the status of the WP in the High Court and the processing of application had been STAYED. Till date, it has not been vacated.
THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA HAS ISSUED A GAZETTEE NOTIFICATION OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING(REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION)RULE, 2013.
THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 28-05-2014
THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES TO BE REGULARISED:
1). BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVED/SANCTIONED BUILDING PLANS.
2). BUILDINGS/COMMERCIAL COMPLEXES WHICH HAS NOT BEEN CONSTRUCTED AS PER THE SANCTIONED/APPROVED PLAN.
3). BUILDINGS/COMMERCIAL COMPLEXES CONSTRUCTED WITHIN BDA JURISDICTION – GROUND – FIRST FLOOR – SECOND FLOOR AND ADDITIONAL FLOORS. (GRAM PANCHAYAT APPROVAL BEYOND GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR)
4). REVENUE SITES WITHOUT DC CONVERSION.
5). DC CONVERTED SITES AND LAYOUTS CONVERTED FOR RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL USE UNDER DC CONVERSION ORDERS BUT WITHOUT LAYOUT APPROVAL FROM BDA (WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION) BMRDA (WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION) AND ALL OTHER PLANNING AUTHORITIES JURISDICTION ACROSS THE STATE.
6). SET BACK DEVIATION OR VIOLATION.
7). FLOOR AREA RATIO DEVIATION.