BCCHS LAYOUT – HIGH COURT RESERVES THE ORDER


THE SINGLE BENCH OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, WHICH IS HEARING THE WP 16858 AND 22445/2004, ON THE ISSUE OF LAND ACQUISITION OF/BY BCCHS( LAYOUT), VAJARAHALLY, KANAKAPURA ROAD, UTTARAHALLY HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, HAS RESERVED THE ORDERS.

IT IS CONTENDED BY TWO LAND OWNERS, THAT THERE WAS NO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EVEN AFTER 15 YEARS OF ACQUISITION AND APPROACHED THE SUPREME COURT AND AN ORDER WAS PASSED  AND SUBSEQUENT TO THE ORDER, ALL THE OTHER LANDLORDS, WHOSE LANDS HAD BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE SAID HOUSING SOCIETY, SUBMITTED A PLAINT TO QUASH THE ACQUISITION ORDER.

LONG LEGAL BATTLE IS ENSUED?

IT IS EVIDENT THAT, EVEN THOUGH, SEVERAL OPPORTUNITIES WERE GIVEN TO BOTH (ALL) (LAND OWNERS/PRESENT SITE OWNERS/BCCHS/ORIGINAL ALLOTTESS) THE PARTIES, COULD NOT REACH A CONSENSUS POINT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.  NONE OF THEM TOUCHED THE CORE ISSUE.

 

THERE ARE TOO MANY ISSUES INVOLVED BUT ALL OF THEM REVOLVE AROUND ONLY ONE SUBJECT – MONEY ?

WHO GETS WHAT? HOW MUCH? HOW TO DEAL? WHOM TO DEAL WITH? WHO IS THE MASTER BRAIN BEHIND THE SCENE? WHERE TO KNOCK? HOW TO RESOLVE? WHO IS GOING TO PAY? WHY SHOULD I PAY? ONLY ORIGINAL OWNER HAS TO PAY? LET OTHERS PAY? LET ME WATCH? WILL I BE AFFECTED? WHO ARE ALL AFFECTED? WHO HAS THE MAJORITY OF THE SITES? HOW MANY HAS THE SALE AGREEMENTS FROM THE RESELLERS? WHOM TO TRUST? CAN I TRUST HIM? HOW TO GIVE MONEY? WHOM TO GIVE MONEY? WHAT IS THE GUARANTEE? WHAT GUARANTEE? WHO IS LYING? WHAT WILL BE THE ORDER? WHAT TO DO NOW?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s