ILLEGAL AND UNAUTHORISED LAYOUTS – GONE – IN ARKAVATHY ZONE -DEMOLITION MAN


TOOO MANY APARTMENTS, COMPLEXES, COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, LAYOUTS, SITES CANNOT BE REGULARISED EVEN UNDER THE NOROTRIOUS SCHEME ` AKRAMA-SAKRAMA`, THOSE WHO HAVE BOUGHT WITH THE IMPRESSION THAT ALL CRIMINAL AND ILLEGAL ACTS CAN BE REGULARISED BY PAYING THE PENALTY OR FINE, WILL BE FOR A `SHOCK`.

ONE SUCH EXAMPLE IS THIS 143 ILLEGAL LAYOUTS: WATCH OUT FOR MORE:

WE HAD REJECTED AND ADVISED OUR CLIENTS FROM BUYING PROPERTY IN ARKAVATHY ZONE, EVEN FOR ONE OF THE TOP INDUSTRIES, WHO HAD PLANNED FOR A GODOWN.  ON OUR SUGGESTION, THEY REVIEWED THE PROJECT AND DEFERRED THE PROJECT.

 

The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday set up a Special Monitoring Committee (SMC) to oversee measures taken to protect and preserve Tippagondanahalli (T.G. Halli) catchment area and nominated Additional Chief Secretary V. Umesh as its chairman.

The committee will have powers to oversee the functions and issue necessary directions to the existing committees and various statutory authorities that are responsible for protecting the area, particularly Zone-3 of the catchment area, as per the November 18, 2003 notification issued by the State categorising the catchment area into different zones for its protection.

Additional Chief Secretary M.N. Vidhashankar, who is in-charge of the Commerce and Industries Department; Principal Secretaries T.M. Vijaya Bhaskar (Rural Development and Panchayat Raj), and P.N. Srinivasachary (Urban Development), Basavaraj (Revenue), and Ramachandra, Secretary, Ecology and Environment, will be the members of SMC. S.B. Honnur, Additional Director (Town Planning), Bangalore Metropolitan Regional Development Authority, will be its member-secretary.

The chairman of the SMC has been asked to submit an affidavit on January 10, 2014 indicating its activities till January 9. The SMC has been directed to meet every week, and if not possible at least once in two weeks.

The court passed the order while hearing petitions filed by owners of properties alleging that notices were issued to them for demolishing unauthorised structures put up by them in the Zone-3 while leaving out several others. The court prima facie accepted their contention as a survey indicated existence of a large number of unauthorised constructions put up by others in the area.

 

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s